Alf Landon lead a weak campaign against Roosevelt. He rarely did any campaigning after his nomination, and his attacks on social security were all developed by other republicans. Landon was weak at public speaking and did not speak well on the radio. Landon respected Roosevelt, but felt that the New Deal was too hard on business and involved lots of inefficiency. He became ridiculed for his policies by other Democrats.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed69b/ed69b5a932857fba72989f7381170705cf491431" alt="Image result for alf landon vs roosevelt"
Although Roosevelt ended up winning by a landslide, there was an interesting twist to the election. There was a large nationwide Literary Digest poll which had predicted the last 5 elections correctly, and this year it received 2.3 million responses. It predicted that Landon would win by 370 electoral votes. This was because all anti-Roosevelt supporters felt more strongly about the election than the average Roosevelt supporter, thus they were more likely to take the poll seriously.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72948/729482d33b6bea61547e5cce435d63551d31f13d" alt=""
In the end, Roosevelt won by a landslide, winning 46/48 possible states. He won the popular vote by 60%. Many people thought that this landslide victory for the Democrats was the end for the Republican party.
https://www.270towin.com/1936_Election/
https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/the-1936-election-a-polling-catastrophe/
Interesting - I didn't know about the Literary Digest poll results. Do you think that notion of the possible unreliability of polls still exists today? Do the polls influence how other people vote, come election day?
ReplyDelete