As a result of globalization, the sovereignty of the nation-state has declined. This can be seen when individual countries have less influence over corporations because of their ability to relocate overseas and ignore regulations. However, to Hardt and Negri, this does not mean sovereignty has declined, but rather, is shifting to a global level. This is where they coin the term Empire.
Unlike the sovereignty of the nation-state, Empire is deterritorialized. This means (roughly, not really) that while nation-states are defined by clear boundaries, a central locus of power, Empire is fluid, and lacking in any clear center, composed, rather, "of a series of national and supranational organisms united under a single logic of rule."
However, under this Empire, there is also possibility for change. Here, Hardt and Negri introduce the concept of the Multitude, where the conditions of the Empire enable its overthrow. Global capitalism obviously exploits many workers and is an overall oppressive system (that's a blog post for another time, I guess), and thus, Empire, no longer limited by national boundaries, allows a truly global reorganization of democracy, a counter-Empire.
This new development of sovereignty is pretty clearly relevant to the United States today. The ceding of our own nation's sovereignty to a fluid, immanent Empire may have drastic implications. No longer is the United States a solely imperialist power, but rather, merely a piece in the globalized phenomenon known as Empire.
These are rhizomes. They are relevant somehow.
Source:
http://culturalstudiesnow.blogspot.com/2017/03/empire-hardt-and-negri-summary.html
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIf it is indeed true that capitalism has become a global force that has rendered traditional boundaries of sovereignty useless, how would you explain the particular differences in the capitalist state from place to place? For example, Zizek claims that capitalism actually de-totalizes global world meaning; there is no proper, or model, capitalist civilization.
ReplyDeleteIn addition, do you think Hardt and Negri would categorize Trump's rise to power as a reaction against Empire or as a symptom of it, since he wants to pull back against globalization but is definitely a profiteer of capitalism?